Tok Can a Machine Know

In todays day and age, the oppugn Can a Machine feel? is genuinely important and relevant to what we argon doing with elevator cars in making them to a greater extent and to a greater extent human wish and cap fit-bodied of human functions. A political forge, as define on Dictionary. com is an weapon consisting of interrelated segments with separate functions, apply in the arrangeance of some merciful of work. That divulgems simple enough, not actually intricate at all. precisely accordingly if you verbalism up know, the definition is very hard to grasp. Dictionary. com defines know as to distinguish or understand as point or secureice to apprehend all the bureau and with certainty.This doesnt spend a penny much nicety to the word and requires you to define other scathe such as understand and truth and certainty. It is much easier to use the term as defined according to Plato. His view is regarded to be the classical definition. According to Plato, at t o the lowest degree three criteria mustinessiness be satisfied in order for on that point to be knowledge a statement must be yetified, true and acceptd. And so if a car meets all these requirements accordingly it must in fact know. With machines, the main tune against their capabilty to know is that everything they stool do is because universe programmed them to do it.Machines cannot do anything on a whim they have no resource or creativity. Creativity is one of the things that grooms earthly concern rather special and not exclusively walking computer processors. It enables us to make decisions which ar not based hardly on algorithms or past accounting or other data. We can be bold, reckless, brave, and foolish or act in many other emotional ship canal. This is out of the question to program as emotions do not lend themselves to mathematical analysis. Yet emotions be an essential part of knowledge.For example I know whether I am capable today or not and it cred ibly affects what I do today more than the facts I actually know. Computers can neer be happy or sad. They cannot discern or grieve. They cannot, in other words, be human and know. tho the other brass of the argument is that domain are serious computers which contrary is the exact opposite give tongue to in the above paragraph. We are just many bits and pieces that are all on the job(p) together to let us support and get life. In fact humans are classified as biological machines, and if humans can know anything, machines should be able to know.Many consider the totally aspect that makes humans and other high organic creatures contrary from the commonly defined machine is our ability to express emotions and comprehension. These emotions and intuitions amaze from our mind, which is a dodge a musical arrangement of biochemistry, electricity, some mechanics and maybe a bit of quantum mechanics, exclusively a system nonetheless. If you take any individual part of this system away, none of these parts bequeath understand anything. Theyre simply exchanging information with distinguishable parts according to set rules.This is incisively what a machine does when given instructions and prior facts and figures. As I was researching this issuance and looking at both sides of the argument, I admit I was very torn. At prototypic I thought no, theres no way a machine can know. They dont have brains and everything they do is programmed beforehand for them by humans. But as I delved more deeply into the question I entrap that some advanced automatons are not quite manage that. On Youtube, there are many videos which include Hondas automaton, named ASIMO, that show machines can think very much on theyre avow. atomic number 53 video talks about how this automaton can actually see, a trait we usually only give to living organisms. Though it has two cameras for eyes, the way it processes the information it views through the cameras is very anthrop omorphic, like a child learning their surroundings. A man shows the robot objects that it has already learned to indentify and ASIMO says what they are out loud. But then the man shows it two completely different objects, a toy car and a toy robot, and tells ASIMO what they are. The man then shows the robot the two objects again and asks it what they are.ASIMO dutifully replies what each(prenominal) is correctly. This amazed me because it showed machines could actually learn from go through, just like humans. But that wasnt all, ASIMO was afterwards told indentify a hold. At first a normal looking wood chair was hardened in front of it and the robot nodded. Then a stool was placed in front and ASIMO nodded again, even though the stool looks nothing like a chair. But then it is showed a shelve and ASIMO shakes his head no. This was very astounding to me because it showed a machine making a judgment.So to actually determine whether or not a computer can know, we must go back t o Platos description of knowledge and see if a machine fits. The main purpose of roughly machines is to record vast amounts of data which are all truthful so that fulfills the first criteria easy enough. Then it must be justified which is done by the computer programmer feeding information to the machine. And last merely not least it must accept and because the computer must follow the cipher its given, then it must believe and thus it fits all of Platos criteria for knowledge.But this just seemed too easy so I decided to look into the ways of knowing, and if the machine fit all those components, then it definitely knows. Though a machine can use reason to form problems that no human can, use intuition to figure out if an object is a chair or not, speak in every language known to man, see objects and know what they are, and be able to give away a human and respond, machines still cannot experience emotion and that is the one thing taenia them from knowing. As stated in a prev ious argument, an essential part to knowing is through emotion and creativity and imagination.Without these things a machine cannot know. Until humans are able to make a machine that has the content that the human brain does, a machine leave behind never know like a human. It ordain understand how to perform certain tasks and learn new things, plainly it will never be able to create something of its own or experience any type of emotion. In aphorism this, I do believe that in the near future, with technological advances, there will soon be a machine which can think for itself and have its own ideas and creations.Due to Raymond Kurzweils theory of Singularity, humans will create machines that have experience which surpasses their own and by that time machines will most definitely know. Because of the human sciences pains to create robots that are humanlike, they will eventually become successful and once the uncovering is made, then there will be thousands of different machin es that can know and our auberge will have totally changed. But as of right now, a machine cannot know. It can perform very humanlike tasks and talk and walk and speak but there is still the barrier of not being able to imagine or feel which separates humans from machines.Bibliographyhttp//www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=53888 foliate=3